Back to East Los Angeles College Home page

East Los Angeles College Header and Logo


EAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE
Budget & Planning Advisory Committee
 Monday, April 25, 2005
Library Conference Room
1:00 – 2:30 p.m.



 

PRESENT David Senensieb Kathie Kingett,
Rich Guy Daniel Judge
Robert Isomoto John Long
Renee Martinez Ted Strinz
RC Williams III James Cadman
David Beaulieu Kathleen Burke-Kelly
Michael Simone Leonor Perez
Brenda Baity Olita Tulifua
ABSENT Ernest H. Moreno Norma Cardenas
Richard Moyer Erlinda de Ocampo
Rin Kahla Selina Chi
Lawrence Powell Wendy Bass
  Katherine Pfeiffer,  
     
GUESTS Gary Johnston Gonzalo Mendoza

CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
     Co-Chairperson, Rich Guy, called the meeting to order at 1:15 p.m.


APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
 
    M/S/P (Kingett/Beaulieu) to approve the minutes of April 11, 2005 as presented.

PRESIDENT'S REPORT
   
Mr. Isomoto informed the committee that Mr. Moreno was absent due to his visitation to the mix-site campuses in Baltimore, Boston, MIT and Chicago.

Dr. Perez provided the following information on the ELAC South Gate property:
An environmental report is currently being conducted on the property. The adjacent area and hazard conditions are being looked at.

Mr. Isomoto mentioned that the owner of the property purchased nine additional acres.

Mr. Senensieb asked if the community or individuals at the district level had expressed any concern with regards to the article or if they were still in support of our college. Dr. Perez replied that after getting in contact with the consultant, we were informed that the college is still receiving support from the community.

LA Times Article
EBPAC members expressed their concern pertaining to the article released on the South Gate property.

Mr. Beaulieu commented that district leaders were very interested in knowing whether faculty would speak regarding the article and Mr. Beaulieu answered that there were no faculty that he was aware of planning to do so. Mr. Beaulieu said that he was surprised after reading the article numerous times as to the details, and expressed his concern.

In response to Mr. Beaulieu’s concerns, Dr. Perez stated that it is important that this matter be addressed once the EIR is provided and the facts are known. Mr. Senensieb agreed with Dr. Perez’s suggestion and said we will revisit the issue once the EIR is obtained. Dr. Perez will follow up on the status of the EIR.

Mr. Miramontes informed the committee that elected officials had yet not read the article. Mr. Miramontes also announced that there will be South Gate City Council voting tomorrow night on the MOU.

Dr. Perez noted that the city of South Gate is full of chemical plants, and the issue of the location of our college is not unique to this one place. It is merely the condition of the city.

FACILITIES REPORT

Mr. Johnston distributed ELAC Bond Project Highlights (week ending 4/22/05) and gave an overview. (See attached).

Mr. Senensieb asked what was meant by “working to get it back into budget” pertaining to the Math/Science complex. Mr. Johnston replied that the estimates went over the curve budget amount, and as a result, the contract has to be looked at again. This revision would take two to three weeks.

Dr. Kingett asked why the Language Arts Building project was put on hold. Mr. Johnston replied that the Language Arts was submitted below the line, and is under schematic design.

Mr. Beaulieu also asked what was meant by the Language Arts Building project being put on hold, and Mr. Johnston replied that it was due to budget issues. Mr. Isomoto replied that it was necessary for all the numbers to be relooked at.

Mr. Beaulieu asked why, if Language Arts was put on hold, it was not discussed at the Facilities meeting. Mr. Johnston responded that the project was put on hold after the meeting was held. Mr. Guy commented that with the list of projects, regardless of them being categorized, they must move on through the schematic design, but it is also contingent on another concept based on multi disciplinary building and possibly in viewing it with the Language Arts which needs to be done through schematic design.

Mr. Beaulieu inquired where the temporary bungalows would be placed. Mr. Johnston answered that they will be placed in the Northwest parking lot, a couple at the C-bungalows, four at the Pool parking and the remainder in the Northeast parking area.

Mr. Isomoto informed the committee that there are issues in obtaining approval for the water model which is due on Friday. The N2 building is in jeopardy since the fire department is requiring six thousand gallons of water pressure to approve. Mr. Johnston took the initiative and went directly to the president CEO of California water to assure that it got approved by Friday.

DBC REPORT

Mr. Beaulieu reported that the District Budget Committee meeting was cancelled; therefore, there was no report.

A budget update will be available after the May revise.

BUDGET UPDATE

Mr. Isomoto reported that ELAC is doing fine in terms of budget. The college spent a $1 million less than it was projected to spend for this fiscal year. The district has projected an ending balance of $32 million which is an improvement compared to last year’s balance of $22 million. The May 13 revise will determine how the budget will impact the college for the next fiscal year.

STRATEGIC PLANNING REPORT

Dr. Perez provided the following report:
Program Review

  1. A public notice was sent out with information on Program Review for the following units: Escalante, Math Tutorial, MESA, Women’s P.E., Business Administration Computer Applications and Office Technology, EOPS/CARE, University Center, and Reprographics.
  2. There is a group of six to eight trained members per unit that will be reviewing and validating. The validation committee will be meeting next week and is working to finalize recommendations and have them forwarded to EBPAC committee by May 23, 2005.
  3. A list of 15 units for the fall will be provided at the next EBPAC meeting.
In order to avoid having program review and accreditation prep being done at the same time, the accreditation prep will be worked on after program review is complete, which will include Ed Planning, Strategic Planning, and Self Study.

Mr. Isomoto mentioned that the work being performed by Dr. Perez will save an enormous amount of time when it is time for the next accreditation visit.

Learning outcomes is another accreditation requirement. Anthony Samad has been identified to be the coordinator and Dr. Perez will meet with him to discuss what his institutional involvement will be.

Ms. Martinez reported that the equipment and software have PO numbers, thanks to Laura Ramirez, Alba Jiron, Luis Velasquez and staff. All documentation is checked and inputted to a computer making it possible to obtain a better record on what is being purchased and having all equipment accounted for.

Dr. Perez clarified that the information just mentioned by Ms. Martinez is relevant to Program Review because inventory information is requested for Program Review.

Mr. Beaulieu stated the Ed Planning committee discussed the instituting of English Advisory for non-English courses. There were objections made by departments like the Social Science department, but other departments are still planning on proceeding. At the district level, Rocky Young has expressed his support for advisories. The district has purchased a degree audit system that will be very helpful for students and will provide research assessment to keep track students in terms of degree preparation. The counselors are very excited with this purchase. Eighty percent of districts in the state are already using this system.

WORK ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE REPORT
 
Mr. Guy gave an update on the purchase of the shuttles for the DSP&S department. There will be a total of 7 eight-passenger shuttles operating (4 green). Not all shuttles run at the same time, since they need to be charged to operate.

TECHNOLOGY REPORT
 
Ms. Martinez gave an overview of the minutes from the last Technology meeting held on March 29, 2005.

  1. Flex Credit-Professional Handbook for 2004-2006 has been approved. A copy will be sent out and is available on the web.
  2. Kerrin McMahan is the new faculty Co-chair and is also the Technology Ambassador to the CCC conference.
  3. Departments in the E-3 and E-5 have three options to choose from in terms of smart classroom computers.
  4. The next IT meeting is scheduled for Thursday, April 28 in the President’s Conference room at 1:30 p.m., but the meeting might be changed due to conflict with interviews.
  5. The email system has been successfully migrated to Microsoft Exchange 5.5.
  6. The first cascading of computers will be done. Computers are expected to be received by the Summer 2005.
  7. An Ad Hoc Committee was established to keep web pages updated, which is very critical.
  8. People took advantage of conference tickets that were donated by the Electronic classrooms.
  9. There is a study being performed on staff and computer ratios.
Mr. Strinz asked what will happen to the old computers. Ms. Martinez responded that they will go to I.T. and then emails will be sent out to see if anyone can use them. The attempt is to get computers that are five years old off the system.

Dr. Kingett asked if there are salvaged computers in the basement of the auditorium. Mr. Guy responded yes, but that the salvaged computers are being photographed and tagged for surplus.

Technology meetings are held on Thursdays at 1:30 p.m. in the President’s Conference Room.

Mr. Senensieb inquired on the upgrades that appear when the computer is turned on, and he suggested that a system be utilized where employees are not left with the responsibility of upgrading their own computers. Mr. Mendoza replied that there is a system (ELAC does not have it yet) that can monitor all computers on campus and install the service packs (patches) provided by Microsoft for MS Windows XP, MS Office, Internet Explorer, PC Clients such as SAP, MS Outlook, antivirus as well as the installation of new applications. This way, the individual user will not have to do it themselves or overlook service packs all together. I.T. will provide a proposal with a time frame and cost associated for such system in the near future.

Mr. Beaulieu reported that the district is setting up a committee composed of faculty consultants and district people. Kerrin McMahan will be the East representative technology advisory council for the DAS.

ANNOUNCEMENT
 
Mr. Senensieb announced that the Foundation Scholarship Dinner will be held on Thursday, May 19, 2005 at Steven's Steakhouse. Foundation will give out awards, but other departments can handout their own awards. Everyone is encouraged to participate. David Morin has established a scholarship through monthly donations and has endowed it for math majors. Ms. Martinez and Mr. Senensieb commended Ms. Chi on her great work. Due to Ms. Chi’s unavailability to attend today’s meeting, Mr. Senensieb suggested that Ms. Chi be put on the agenda for the next meeting in order for her to provide more information on the Foundation office.

Mr. Beaulieu mentioned that there is lack of general funds and suggested that something be done to boost up the endowment for the scholarships.

Mr. Mendoza expressed his concern with the tables in front of the doors of the Mente Lab since it can be a safety hazard if people should be evacuated in an emergency. Mr. Judge replied that he would come up with a solution to address this concern.

Adjournment
M/S/P to adjourn meeting at 2:10 p.m.
 

 
© 1999-2005   East Los Angeles College      1301 Avenida Cesar Chavez      Monterey Park CA 91754      323.265.8650      Revised 05/11/05